Commodity vs. Security: Does It Matter If Crypto Is a Security?

The classification of cryptocurrencies is a highly debated topic in the crypto industry. Investors often question whether cryptos should be considered commodities, securities or another category altogether. This matter significantly impacts the legal status, taxation and regulation of digital assets, as well as their potential for adoption and innovation. This blog post will dive into the ongoing debate between commodity and security classification within the crypto world and explore how various jurisdictions and authorities tackle this issue.

Key Takeaways:

• Commodities are goods that can be traded on the market, while securities are financial instruments that represent ownership or debt.

• Bitcoin is widely considered a commodity, while other cryptocurrencies may be deemed securities, depending upon their design and distribution.

• The classification of crypto assets affects their legal rights, obligations and risks, as well as their market potential and innovation opportunities.

Understanding Crypto: Is It a Commodity or a Security?

Before addressing the commodity vs. security debate, we first need to define these terms. A commodity is an exchangeable commercial good, like raw materials or agricultural products. Commodities are often used to produce other goods and services. Examples of commodities include gold, oil, wheat and coffee. Commodity trading often takes place on futures markets, where contracts are created to buy or sell a commodity at a predetermined price and date.

On the other hand, a security is a tradable financial instrument with monetary value. It represents claims on the issuer’s assets or future cash flows. Common securities include stocks, bonds, options and derivatives. They are typically traded on exchanges or over-the-counter markets, where buyers and sellers agree on a price and quantity. Securities are subject to various laws and regulations, depending upon the jurisdiction.

Classifying crypto assets as commodities or securities depends upon specific characteristics, such as purpose, functionality and governance. For example, specific cryptocurrencies are designed to serve as a store of value, means of exchange or unit of account, while others provide access to a network, platform or service. Some cryptocurrencies are decentralized and distributed among many nodes, while others are essentially centralized and controlled by a single entity. Likewise, some cryptocurrencies have a fixed supply and issuance schedule while others have variable or inflationary supply mechanisms.

Due to these factors, different authorities and jurisdictions view and treat crypto assets differently. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regards Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies that function as substitutes for fiat currency, to be considered commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers specific cryptocurrencies to be securities, according to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes cryptocurrencies issued through initial coin offerings (ICOs) or token sales, whereby investors expect to receive a return on their investment from the efforts of others.

Classifying Bitcoin: Commodity or Security?

The world's first and most beloved cryptocurrency is Bitcoin. It was created in 2009 by a person or persons going by the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin's secure transactions and double-spending prevention (i.e., no one can spend the same digital currency at the same time) rely on a peer-to-peer (P2P) network that uses cryptography. The currency has a finite supply of 21 million coins created through mining, a process by which computers compete to solve complex mathematical problems and earn rewards in bitcoins.

Bitcoin is widely considered to be a commodity (rather than a security) by most authorities and 

jurisdictions because it has no central issuer or authority controlling its creation or distribution. It also does not confer any ownership or debt rights to its holders. Bitcoin was created primarily as a decentralized digital currency that users can rely on for payments or transfers, without intermediaries or censorship.

The CFTC has explicitly stated since 2015 that Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are commodities under the CEA. This stance means that Bitcoin futures and options contracts are subject to the CFTC's oversight and regulation. The CFTC has also brought enforcement actions against entities that they believe have engaged in fraud or manipulation involving Bitcoin or other virtual currencies.

The SEC has also acknowledged that Bitcoin is not a security under its jurisdiction. In 2018, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said, "Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are not securities, but rather are types of currencies." However, he also warned that "just because something is a currency does not mean that it cannot also be a security." He added, "If a cryptocurrency or a product with its value tied to one or more cryptocurrencies is a security, our securities laws apply."

The Role of the SEC in Crypto Regulation

The SEC is the main regulator of securities in the U.S. Its mission is to protect investors, maintain fair and orderly markets, and facilitate capital formation. It has the authority to enforce federal securities laws and regulate the securities industry, including securities exchanges, brokers, dealers, investment advisers and rating agencies.

The SEC has been actively involved in crypto since 2017, when it issued a report on a virtual organization known as The DAO that raised funds through an ICO in 2016. The SEC concluded that The DAO’s tokens were securities under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act, and that The DAO and its promoters violated the registration and disclosure requirements of these laws. It also warned that other ICOs or token sales may be subject to the same rules and regulations.

Since then, the SEC has brought several enforcement actions against crypto projects that are believed to have violated its securities laws. Some of these include Telegram, Kik, Block.one, Ripple and BitClave. The SEC has also issued guidance and statements on various aspects of crypto regulation, such as the framework for determining whether a digital asset is a security, the application of the Howey Test to crypto assets, the registration and reporting requirements for crypto securities, and the custody and trading rules for crypto assets.

Some industry watchers have criticized the SEC's approach to crypto regulation as being too restrictive, unclear or inconsistent, arguing that the SEC's definition of security is too broad and vague, and stifles innovation and competition in the crypto industry. Others claim that the SEC's enforcement actions are selective and arbitrary and don’t provide enough guidance or clarity for crypto entrepreneurs and investors. And still others contend that the SEC's jurisdiction over crypto assets is limited or questionable — and it should defer to other regulators or lawmakers.

The Impact of Classification on the Future of Crypto

The legal classification of crypto assets as either commodities or securities has far-reaching implications for their regulation, taxation and market potential. Commodities are typically subject to less stringent rules and regulations than securities, and they aren’t required to register with regulators or disclose information to investors or the public. 

Additionally, commodities are taxed differently than securities, and capital gains tax is applied when commodities are sold or exchanged. Conversely, securities are subject to more rigorous regulations, and they must register with the SEC or obtain an exemption before being sold to investors. They must also comply with various disclosure and reporting requirements to investors and regulators, and are subject to greater oversight and enforcement actions. 

Securities may offer more protection and assurance to investors who seek security and transparency in their investments and benefit from greater recognition by regulators and institutions. On the other hand, commodities may feature more liquidity and accessibility because they can be created without registration, fostering innovation and experimentation in the crypto space. However, securities may be available to more institutional capital and provide more funding and resources to crypto projects, which can foster widespread interest.

The Implications of Cryptocurrency as a Security

The distinction between commodities and securities holds significant legal and regulatory implications for those involved in the crypto market. Commodities, such as gold, oil and wheat, can be traded on a market. Conversely, securities represent ownership or debt claims on an entity, including stocks, bonds and derivatives. Securities are subject to more regulation than commodities, with complex rules and oversight agencies in place to ensure market integrity and protect investors.

Determining whether a crypto asset is a commodity or security depends upon the asset's nature, design and purpose; the rights and obligations of the parties involved; and market participants' expectations. For instance, Bitcoin, the first successful and most popular cryptocurrency, is widely regarded as a commodity because it’s a scarce and fungible digital good that can be exchanged for other goods and services. However, some cryptocurrencies — especially those issued through ICOs or granting holders certain benefits or privileges within a network or platform — may be deemed securities as they resemble equity or debt instruments.

Crypto Securities: An In-Depth Analysis

Crypto securities are a unique class of cryptocurrencies that possess features of securities and are bound by securities laws and regulations. They can assume different forms, such as coins, tokens or shares, and can represent a range of rights or claims like ownership, profit sharing, voting, access or utility. Typically, crypto securities are issued through ICOs or other crowdfunding platforms, whereby the issuers collect funds from investors in exchange for crypto tokens that confer specific benefits or entitlements.

However, crypto securities present a host of challenges and risks for both regulators and investors. On the one hand, regulators struggle to apply established securities laws and frameworks to decentralized, global and ever-evolving crypto assets. On the other hand, investors face uncertainties and vulnerabilities when dealing with crypto assets that are volatile, illiquid and susceptible to fraud or manipulation. As a result, all parties involved in crypto securities must exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence.

Global Perspective on Crypto Regulation

The regulation of crypto assets varies greatly across different countries and jurisdictions. Some nations embrace crypto innovation and adoption, while others remain cautious and restrictive. Some have established clear and comprehensive rules and guidelines for crypto assets, while others have vague or inconsistent regulations. Certain countries determine the status of each crypto asset through a case-by-case approach based on its features and functions. Meanwhile, others have taken a broad-brush approach, categorizing most or all crypto assets as securities or commodities.

Countries such as Switzerland, Singapore, Malta, Japan, Canada and the U.K. are known for their favorable and clear regulations governing crypto assets. These nations acknowledge the potential benefits of crypto innovation, and have provided regulatory clarity and legal certainty for crypto businesses and investors. In contrast, countries like China, India, Russia, Iran and Venezuela have unclear or unfavorable regulations for crypto assets. These nations have imposed restrictions or even bans on crypto activities, leading to legal ambiguity and uncertainty for crypto stakeholders.

Overall, the regulatory landscape for crypto assets is complex and constantly evolving. Businesses and investors need to stay informed and up-to-date on the regulation of crypto assets in different countries and jurisdictions to ensure compliance and mitigate risks.

The Bottom Line

Crypto assets are a diverse and evolving digital asset category with different implications for regulators, investors and users, depending upon their classification as commodities or securities. The classification of crypto assets isn’t always straightforward or consistent across different jurisdictions, and may change over time as the crypto industry develops and matures. Therefore, all parties involved in the crypto space must stay informed on the latest events and trends in crypto regulation. Investors need to understand the relevant jurisdictions and perform due diligence when dealing with crypto assets.

#Bybit #TheCryptoArk