Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin has gained momentum in decentralized finance (DeFi), attracting significant supply to Aave’s V3 Ethereum Core market, with a notable amount in loans taken. 

Daily top performer — Sui Network (SUI)

The S&P 500 gained 1.67% on easing trade tensions and Fed reassurance, but pared gains after tariff cut hopes were downplayed. Gold fell from its $3,500 high, signaling a bearish reversal. Key support lies near $3,167, with further downside possible. The Coindesk Indices, which tracks the broader crypto market, fell 0.53%, with Bitcoin and Ether up 2.19% and 5.92%, respectively, in the past 24 hours. Trade these markets and more with up to 500x leverage on Bybit MT5 using this 

Today's top performer is SUI, up 7.3%, following OVERTAKE's partnership with Sui to build a scalable and trustless game asset trading platform.

Sui Network (SUI), founded in 2022, is a Layer 1 blockchain by Mysten Labs, built to improve web3 scalability, speed, and security. It aims to reduce smart contract latency and support innovative NFT gaming, like Sui Monstar, with a developer-friendly environment. 

, efficient game asset trading platform. Leveraging Sui’s object-centric architecture, parallel execution, zkLogin, and modular infrastructure, OVERTAKE aims to enable trustless trading, verified in-game assets, and a real, on-chain game economy.

Check out the latest prices, charts, and data of 

 has gained momentum in decentralized finance (DeFi), attracting significant supply to Aave’s V3 Ethereum Core market, with a notable amount in loans taken. Initially slow, the stablecoin's growth has accelerated after its debut on Aave. RLUSD has a market cap close to $300 million and a supply cap, with borrowing limited to a specific amount. Ripple aims for RLUSD to become a top-five stablecoin by year-end. Ripple's collaboration with Chainlink enhances RLUSD’s utility across both institutional and DeFi applications.

Yesterday, BTC spot ETFs saw $273.8M in total inflows, all from non-GBTC funds.

, with 10% of MILK’s 1B supply allocated for eligible users—mPoint holders, oolitia NFT holders, and milkINIT testers. Opt-in is required for CEX claims; wallet claims need no action. Pre-deposits close April 26, 12 PM UTC.

Beginner

2.png

Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin gains momentum with Aave integration and growing DeFi presence

VanEck’s BNB Spot ETF proposal could bring BNB to U.S. markets, expanding access and marking a key milestone for BNB Chain's growth in regulated finance.

After the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved spot exchange-traded fund (ETF) products based on 

 (ETH) in 2024, a flurry of new altcoin ETF applications emerged in early 2025. Many prominent asset management firms are vying for the approval of their ETF products, based on coins like 

 (AVAX) and others. Even some smaller-cap meme coins, specifically Pudgy Penguins' 

, have joined the SEC's ETF waiting list.

Given that most top cryptos already have their ETF applications filed with the country's financial regulator, it's little surprise that BNB Chain's 

, the fifth-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, has joined the bandwagon. In late March 2025, the New York–based global investment management giant VanEck registered a trust entity named VanEck BNB ETF in the US state of Delaware. The registration is an early sign that the acclaimed investment manager is planning to lodge a BNB ETF application with the SEC.

If approved, it will be the first US-based BNB ETF product on the market, likely leading to significant growth within BNB Chain's already well-established ecosystem.

On Mar 31, 2025, one of the leading asset managers in the world, VanEck, registered a trust named VanEck BNB ETF in the US state of Delaware. This is the strongest imaginable indicator that the company plans to subsequently launch an application with the SEC for the ETF’s approval. If approved by the regulator, the product will be the first spot ETF in the US to track BNB coin. As of the time of this writing (Apr 23, 2025), VanEck hasn't formally applied with the SEC, but this step is likely imminent.

Following the SEC filing, BNB coin will join a long list of other leading cryptocurrencies whose spot ETF applications have been lodged with the US regulator. Over the past few months, the SEC has received spot ETF applications for Solana, 

The VanEck BNB Spot ETF will track BNB coin, allowing holders to invest in the asset without directly holding it. While BNB is among the most popular assets in the crypto market, many investors are eschewing it and other cryptocurrencies due to their unregulated nature. Upon approval, the ETF product would be available for trading on regulated stock exchanges.

The exact composition of a crypto ETF product is usually unknown before its application is filed with the SEC. Therefore, we can assume that at this stage the ETF will be based entirely upon tracking BNB coin. Any additional components, such as minor holdings of other assets such as cash equivalents, could theoretically be included, but this will only be known upon VanEck’s formal application to the SEC.

VanEck itself is among the leading ETF issuers in the finance industry and is a pioneer of crypto ETFs. The firm already offers approved 

, and has filed applications with the SEC for spot ETFs based on several other cryptocurrencies, including a 

Currently, there’s no ETF in the US based on the BNB coin. In that respect, VanEck’s registration is the first serious effort to introduce such a product. Internationally, there is one exchange-traded product (ETP) that tracks BNB — the 21Shares Binance BNB ETP (ABNB), listed on the Swiss Stock Exchange. This ETP is offered by 21Shares, a leading digital asset management firm based in Zurich, Switzerland.

. ETPs may be based on various assets, such as stocks, bonds, commodities or cryptocurrencies. However, ETFs often offer better liquidity, lower fees and greater tax efficiency than other types of ETPs.

In short, despite the presence of the ABNB ETP on the market, the BNB ETF landscape remains an empty niche, as the 21Shares product isn’t a full-fledged ETF and has no regulatory approval in the US.

Current impact of BNB ETF applications on the crypto market

VanEck’s BNB ETF application — or, to be precise, its registration in Delaware — has so far had no immediate impact on the coin’s market price. In fact, BNB coin is currently trading at $615.68, barely different from its price of $600 in the early days of April when news of the ETF’s registration first surfaced.

BNB is a major cryptocurrency featuring at least one billion dollars in daily trading volumes. The news of VanEck's initiative is unlikely to seriously affect BNB’s price. However, if the ETF ultimately gains approval from the SEC, such a development may have a significant positive impact on the crypto's future price.

What will it mean if a Spot BNB ETF application is approved?

If the SEC approves the Spot BNB ETF, it will likely lead to higher demand for BNB coin — as demand from investors for the product rises, VanEck will need to source more BNB to back its ETF shares. This increased demand would push the price of BNB higher. As noted above, BNB is one of the market's largest cryptos and features substantial trading volumes. Therefore, it's unlikely that a Spot BNB ETF would cause drastic rises in the coin’s price. However, a certain positive price effect is a safe bet, and the magnitude of the effect will be directly related to the popularity of the ETF among investors.

Additionally, the ETF will improve the visibility of the BNB ecosystem, potentially leading to more 

 (DApps) and projects launched on its blockchain.

If approved by the SEC, the Spot BNB ETF by VanEck would usher in a new era for the coin. For the first time ever, BNB as a financial asset would become available through the regulated environment of US stock exchanges. This would not only help support the coin’s price and expand the chain’s ecosystem, but would also be a major reputational gain for Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange and the corporate entity behind BNB Chain.

Over the years, Binance has had its fair share of troubles and arguments with US regulators. A fully approved spot ETF based on Binance’s own coin would, therefore, send a signal to the crypto market that the major components of the Binance ecosystem — BNB crypto, BNB Chain’s blockchain and the Binance crypto exchange — aren’t as risky to deal with as some Americans may believe.

Intermediate

bnb etf.png

BNB Spot ETF: A new gateway as BNB Chain evolves

In this article, we explore liquid staking protocol StakeStone's key features, the STO token launch, tokenomics and how to trade STO on Bybit.

StakeStone (STO) is a next-gen omnichain liquidity infrastructure protocol designed to optimize yield and cross-chain liquidity. Its introduction of liquid yield-bearing versions of ETH and BTC — STONE and STONEBTC — enables users to earn sustainable yield while enhancing capital efficiency. This article explores StakeStone’s architecture, core assets, founding team, tokenomics and recent market performance.

 is a decentralized liquidity infrastructure protocol that issues liquid, 

-bearing assets like STONE (Ethereum) and STONEBTC (Bitcoin). Designed for omnichain integration, it empowers users and protocols with composable 

 solutions and efficient cross-chain liquidity.

Launched in 2024, StakeStone was built to address the fragmented and capital-inefficient nature of ETH and BTC staking by introducing secure, flexible and modular primitives. StakeStone’s mission is to maximize on-chain yield while ensuring deep liquidity across ecosystems.

StakeStone was founded in 2023 by a team of DeFi-native builders led by Charles K, a crypto veteran with over 10 years of experience in centralized exchanges (CEXs), hardware wallets and DeFi infrastructure The core team includes Rose Li, Chief Strategy Officer, and Ivan K, Chief Marketing Officer.

The project has secured funding from notable crypto funds, including Polychain Capital, Binance Labs, OKX Ventures, Amber Group, HashKey Capital and Bankless Ventures. These backers not only provide capital but also strategic ecosystem access — positioning StakeStone as a serious player in omnichain liquidity and yield infrastructure.

StakeStone converts ETH and BTC into liquid, yield-bearing assets — STONE (ETH) and STONEBTC (respectively) — through a modular and omnichain framework. When ETH is staked, it flows into the StakeStone Vault and is allocated to the Strategy Pool, and STONE is minted via the Minter.

Yield is generated through strategies such as:

Users can deploy STONE across chains via the 

 (LP) rewards, with optional LP locking for enhanced returns. SBTC is the liquid BTC asset mirroring Bitcoin’s value, with STONEBTC adding a yield layer to BTC and unlocking passive income without sacrificing liquidity.

StakeStone implements key security measures, including the following:

STONE (ETH): Omnichain yield-bearing asset

 derivative. It’s minted when users stake ETH, and is backed by underlying yield from stETH, EigenLayer restaking and additional DeFi strategies.

STONE supports seamless cross-chain bridging, enabling deployment across supported networks and STONE-Fi Pools for additional rewards. Users benefit from passive yield, cross-chain utility, governance participation and on-demand liquidity.

SBTC is a liquid Bitcoin asset that mirrors BTC’s value and enables seamless use within EVM-compatible chains. STONEBTC, on the other hand, enhances SBTC by adding a yield layer, empowering users to earn yield from BTC-based strategies while preserving liquidity.

 utility by unlocking native BTC liquidity and enabling new use cases, such as cross-chain lending and borrowing, LP participation in BTC-based DeFi pools and composable integration across multichain DeFi protocols.

Together, SBTC and STONEBTC aim to position Bitcoin as an active capital layer across Ethereum and beyond.

 of StakeStone, with a total supply of 1 billion. It underpins protocol governance via OPAP proposals, voting-escrowed STO (veSTO) staking and 

Emissions are set to taper gradually until 2031, aligning incentives with long-term ecosystem growth.

According to CoinGecko, as of Apr 24, 2025, 

with a market cap of over $25 million. The token has recently shown strong momentum, rallying 85.4% over the past two weeks. Furthermore, StakeStone’s value could benefit from various catalysts, such as the rise in demand for 

 the STOUSDT Perpetual futures contract in the Innovation Zone, with up to 20x leverage.

 a Bybit account, complete identity verification and fund your 

 using crypto deposits or fiat currencies. 

StakeStone STO.png

StakeStone (STO): Cross-chain liquid staking protocol

The MANTRA (OM) token’s wild crash on Apr 13, 2025, shocked the crypto world. Discover the causes, fallout, and what’s next in MANTRA’s road to recovery.

In the morning and daytime hours of Apr 13, 2025, the MANTRA blockchain's native token, OM, sat at a respectable market cap of $6 billion, making it the third-highest-ranked cryptocurrency in the 

 (RWA) category, the area the platform specializes in. Everything seemed like smooth sailing for the token.

Then, just after 6 PM UTC, the price of the OM token suddenly began to free-fall, declining from nearly $6 to about $0.50 in the space of just two hours.

A project that started the day as one of the top players in the RWA field was now worth 90% less as the evening approached. OM's abrupt, sharp crash immediately caught the market's attention, with speculation of a 

However, MANTRA's CEO, John Patrick Mullin, immediately sprang into action for PR damage control on social media, reassuring the public that the team members weren’t dumping OM tokens at all. Instead, MANTRA's founder and CEO alleged that deliberate actions of some 

 (CEXs) had caused the catastrophic plunge.

As of our coverage date of Apr 23, 2025, this is a developing story. In this article, we’ll establish what actually happened, who's involved and what awaits the OM token in the foreseeable future.

 decentralized network dedicated to RWA tokenization and utilization in compliance with real-world regulatory requirements.

 It features high scalability and low transaction fees. The project is one of the earliest initiatives dedicated to RWA use via blockchain technology. Originally, MANTRA debuted as a 

 (ETH) in August 2020. In October 2024, the project migrated to its own dedicated Layer 1 platform, the MANTRA Chain. The MANTRA blockchain is based on the Cosmos SDK framework, and is part of the wider 

The MANTRA ecosystem's main products include MANTRA DEX, a 

 (DEX); a digital identity (DID) management tool; a compliant token development and management solution; and a comprehensive compliance and permissioning system. MANTRA has also partnered with global powerhouses like Google Cloud, and with DAMAC Properties, one of Dubai's most prominent developers, to propel innovative solutions for 

Starting in late 2024, right after its own dedicated mainnet launch, MANTRA had become a significant player in the RWA corner of 

 (DeFi). By late February 2025, the platform’s native OM token had climbed to a value of nearly $9, with its market cap peaking at around $8.2 billion. Before the fateful events of Apr 13, 2025, OM was the third-highest-capped crypto in the RWA category, trading at $6.27, with a market cap of slightly over $6 billion, according to the CoinGecko portal.

In the evening hours (UTC time) of Apr 13, 2025, OM began to lose its value precipitously, dive-bombing from over $6 to about $0.52 in the space of two hours. The token’s market cap fell to slightly under half a billion dollars — a loss of more than 90%.

CEO John Mullin was quickly online, reassuring the crypto community that no team member had sold their OM holdings, and that this wasn’t a case of the bad ol’ rug pull. Instead, Mullin alluded that after OM tokens were moved to two leading CEXs (Binance and OKX) to use as collateral, the exchanges initiated a cascade of 

 of positions backed by the token. Both exchanges refuted the allegations, and connected OM’s price collapse to its recent unusually high price 

, and significant tokenomics changes made to OM in October 2024 that greatly undermined its value.

As a chain of liquidations took place, the token’s price started to plummet, causing significant panic that quickly led to further price drops. The situation only stabilized closer to the end of the day, with OM’s price remaining under $1. As of Apr 23, it’s trading at $0.5543 — a far cry from its rate of over $6 just two weeks ago.

After investigating, crypto analytics firm Lookonchain concluded that 17 wallets had deposited 43.6 million OM tokens (4.5% of the token's circulating supply) into the implicated exchanges. Two of these wallets are believed to belong to Laser Digital, one of MANTRA's investors. Another investor in the project, Shorooq Partners, is also suspected to be among the 17 wallets. Both Shorooq and Laser Digital have denied the allegations.

Although the price plunge was immediately compared to the 2022 collapse of the 

 (LUNA) blockchain, many analysts point out that the two crashes are fundamentally different. Terra's crash resulted from structural abnormalities in the 

 regulating UST, the project's stablecoin. In contrast, OM's fiasco is suspected to be the direct result of market-driven manipulation by 

, and possibly exchanges. No security breach, disruption to services or data, or other adverse structural events have occurred on the platform.

While this development is unprecedented for the project, MANTRA has been embroiled in other controversies throughout its history. One of these was its 

, first announced in August 2024 and then delayed multiple times. Around 50% of the wallets believed to be bots were cut off from the airdrop list. However, many considered the bot-culling process to have been conducted without much proof.

There have also been reports of vote rigging in the project's governance system in a bid to obscure MANTRA’s centralized model of profit allocation. Additionally, some analysts have accused the project of "forced bridging" to manipulate the market price. Platform users had to migrate their Ethereum-based OM tokens to MANTRA's native OM tokens via 

, which would increase gas fees and allow the project team to control the token's circulation pace.

How is MANTRA (OM) headed toward recovery?

MANTRA’s CEO rapidly reassured users that the team is now working hard to jump-start the token’s recovery. On Apr 14, 2025, Mullin unveiled plans to initiate a buyback scheme, along with the intent to burn all OM tokens held by the project team. The team's supply totals 300 million tokens, representing about 17% of the total supply.

He also denied factually incorrect assertions circulating online that the team effectively controls 90% of OM's supply. Mullin further assured the public that no large-scale selling events by investors have occurred.

As OM’s value has stayed firmly under $1, it remains to be seen how these PR efforts — as well as the planned buyback and burn — will affect the token’s future.

 as a swap pair with USDT, or on the Derivatives market as the 

Naturally, given the ongoing situation with the OM token, buying OM is at your own discretion, as right now the token is truly for the adventurous and brave at heart.

As of Apr 23, 2025, the OM token is trading at $0.5543, 93.8% lower than its ATH of $8.99 on Feb 23, 2025, and 3,138.8% higher than its ATL of $0.01726 on Oct 12, 2023.

Curiously, most crypto price prediction portals are optimistic about the OM token's long-term prospects. DigitalCoinPrice 

 of $1.81 in 2027 and $2.82 in 2030, whilePricePrediction 

It's hard to verify all the allegations flying around regarding the involvement of exchanges and key investors in the MANTRA OM incident. What matters at this stage is that the project team has been quick and proactive in injecting transparency and clarity into the situation.

The free fall in the token's price seems to be over by now. In fact, OM’s decline was over within hours of the incident. Moreover, unlike Terra's LUNA and UST coins, OM hasn't become worthless. All these factors point to potential stabilization and recovery ahead. The question now is: Will the pace and magnitude of the recovery be enough to save the project in the long term? At this early stage after the collapse, few people could answer the question with confidence. We'll eagerly await the developments over the next few weeks to see if MANTRA finds its way out of the woods. 

mantra om crypto.png

MANTRA (OM): Understanding its wild ride and road to recovery

Bybit Learn

Stablecoin

Looking to find out more about USDT vs. USDC? Explore our detailed guide to find out the differences and similarities between USDT and USDC.

2401-T16454_Skinny_Banner_for_Blog_and_Learn_Row_53_728x90.png

Skinny_Banner-1600x400.webp

Cryptocurrencies have a reputation for being highly volatile, but not all blockchain tokens vary in value. There's a whole class of cryptos, called stablecoins, that prioritize keeping their price as regular as possible. Many of these 

, such as USDT and USDC, maintain their price by pegging their value to the United States dollar. However, even if their prices seem similar at a glance, USD-pegged stablecoins aren't identical. If you're interested in learning more about stablecoins, explore this guide to find out the differences between USDT and USDC.

 is the largest stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market. Also called Tether, it's been operated by the Tether Limited company since 2014. Tether is pegged to the U.S. dollar, and is backed by a blend of gold and fiat currency.

 is a stablecoin that was introduced in 2018. Previously called USD Coin, this crypto is issued by the Centre Consortium, a joint venture between Coinbase and Circle. USDC is backed by the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasury securities. Its value is pegged to that of the U.S. dollar.

USDT vs. USDC: Differences and Similarities

A single USDT or USDC token might have roughly equivalent values, but this doesn't mean they're interchangeable. There are many different factors to consider if you're looking for the differences between USDC and USDT.

Both USDT and USDC are fiat-backed stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar. This means that they're set up to always have the same value as the American dollar. To help with this goal, their parent companies hold a reserve of dollars to guarantee the value of their coins. 

However, USDC has some additional backing that USDT doesn’t have. In addition to its reserve of dollars, it also holds some 

. These cash-equivalent assets provide an extra level of security for USDC.

USDT is significantly older than USDC. It was launched in 2014, whereas USDC didn’t exist until four years later. USDT also happens to be the first fiat-backed stablecoin in existence. By the time USDC arrived, USDT was already an industry leader with years of brand recognition. 

USDT and USDC are both leaders in the stablecoin markets. For many years, they've routinely outranked their competitors. However, USDT still leads USDC by 

, with an approximate market capitalization of $110 billion as compared to USDC's $33 billion. 

Keep in mind that while USDT is traded more by investors, USDC might be used more for 

 transactions. Data from Visa suggests that in 2024, USDC began to outpace USDT as the preferred choice for stablecoin crypto payments.

Both USDT and USDC offer the option to redeem stablecoins. As part of their mission to demonstrate that stablecoins are just as reliable as fiat currency, their users can trade their stablecoins for U.S. dollars. However, USDT’s redemption capabilities are somewhat more limited. Users can only redeem funds when they hold at least 100,000 USDT, while USDC users can redeem funds as soon as they hold 100 USDC. In addition, users report that USDC's redemption process is simpler and faster.

When it comes to transparency, USDT and USDC have drastically different outlooks. Over the years, USDT has faced many claims about misleading investors. There have been rumors of price manipulation, as well as assertions that Tether doesn’t actually hold the amount of reserves it claims to possess. These concerns regarding transparency have been partially proven in investigations. At one point, Tether was fined by regulatory bodies for holding the reserves that it claimed to have in place 

. Additionally, concerns were raised as to the specifics and integrity of its holdings.

Meanwhile, USDC has been fairly committed to transparency. It uses an independent company that audits its reserves and releases reports to the public on a monthly basis. Compared to Tether's quarterly audits, USDC's audits are more frequent, and provide a more detailed breakdown of its asset reserves.

When it comes to reputation, each of these stablecoins has its pros and cons. USDT is usually seen as an icon within the stablecoin industry, being one of the first and also most recognizable. When users are discussing stablecoins, Tether invariably comes up. Unfortunately, USDT has also had some prominent public relations failures that make investors more wary of its brand.

USDC doesn't have quite as many fans as USDT, and it's viewed as less of a trailblazer. However, its many fans point out that it's much more reliable than Tether. USDC was created partially in reaction to Tether's transparency issues, so investors often speak of it as the safer, more secure option.

As stablecoins, USDC and USDT are both generally valued around $1. However, stablecoins don't generally maintain a value of precisely $1 all of the time. Not only are there occasional fluctuations, such as a coin's price dropping to (for example) $0.9996, but situations can also arise in which prices become drastically altered. These incidents, called depegs, can greatly destabilize the market.

Both USDC and USDT have experienced infamous depegging incidents. While USDT has dropped as low as $0.99, USDC has gone all the way down to $0.87. Although both coins have managed to easily recover in value, any fluctuation can cause problems for investors. Analysis suggests that USDC has had 

Both USDT and USDC claim to follow international financial compliance measures. This means they follow industry best practices for protecting both their funds and their consumers. However, USDT's claims are a little more difficult to verify as compared to those of USDC, whose audits show that its reserves are held within regulated financial organizations so that it can prove it follows laws and recommendations for protecting its investors.

USDC and USDT are both known for their flexibility. They run on multiple blockchains and are used as currency at a variety of traditional and web3 businesses. Though USDT has greater liquidity and supply than USDC, both coins have liquidity large enough to easily support vast amounts of trading. 

There are some differences in where these coins are available. USDT operates on 12 chains, including 

. Meanwhile, USDC is natively supported on 16 chains, including Ethereum, 

 and others. Regardless, even if USDC is on more chains, USDT is accepted by almost twice as many businesses.

As you can see, USDT and USDC both have their own pros and cons. When it comes to USDC vs. USDT, the right choice for you will simply depend upon your priorities and how you plan to use the coin. 

USDT or USDC — Which Is a Better Investment?

Stablecoins don't shift a lot in price, so neither USDT nor USDC will avail you of the potentially wild profit increases of some other types of cryptocurrencies. However, they still have a lot of uses in the 

 investment world. Both USDT and USDC are popular choices for investors who choose to participate in 

When it comes to investing, USDT has a slight edge over USDC. Either one can work well, but USDT simply has a much larger market share. Its larger supply and trading volume and higher market cap all lead to more opportunities for investors. Furthermore, USDT's popularity means it's used in more web3 projects. This all contributes to making USDT more available when you want to use DeFi investing to earn passive income on your tokens. 

Meanwhile, although USDC's slightly more frequent rates of depegging might make it seem scary for an investor, depegging also comes with some opportunities for profit. Not only can you try to use options to 

 the coin, but you can participate in various token 

 in stablecoin prices. However, even if USDC is useful for these sorts of techniques, keep in mind that arbitrage bots, options and other similar investment strategies can be especially risky. Often, only advanced traders who invest at optimal moments end up profiting. 

Which Should You Pay With — USDT or USDC?

If you plan on using either of these stablecoins to buy more crypto or make other purchases, USDC is often the better choice. The coin has a better track record for transparency and regulatory compliance. Furthermore, it's easier to convert your USDC back into U.S. dollars, which makes it a flexible payment choice. 

The other primary consideration is USDT's widespread adoption. Even if USDC makes more sense as a payment method, some businesses only accept USDT. Therefore, if you can only choose one stablecoin and want to be able to spend it in many locations, USDT might be the better pick for you.

If you prefer long-term planning, it's essential to consider the futures of both USDC and USDT. Right now, USDT's popularity makes it the go-to option for many activities. However, more and more crypto enthusiasts are becoming wary of Tether. USDC’s reputation as the safer option might serve it well in the future. 

Industry data paints an intriguing picture of which coin is on the rise. Not only has USDC been 

 in the past year, but the summer of 2024 has led to big changes for this token. When Circle became the first stablecoin to receive approval from European regulators, traders took note, and tremendous growth in trading volume took place for USDC. By the end of July, volume was 

This has led to a lot of speculation about Tether finally being outpaced by USDC. Crypto trends suggest that regulation will become even more common in the future — and USDC is already doing a great job of satisfying regulations. Unless USDT is able to greatly improve its security and transparency, it may struggle to keep up.

Ultimately, both USDT and USDC have many reasons to hold their positions at the top of the stablecoin market. While USDT is an industry icon that holds large market shares, USDC has managed to become one of the most reliable and transparent choices. Currently, there's no definitive decision on which one is better, but rising interest in USDC suggests it might be the stablecoin of the future.

USDT vs. USDC: The Battle for Stablecoin Supremacy

Compete for 2,500 USDT USDT Every Week

USDT vs. USDC: The Battle for Stablecoin Supremacy

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards

Compete for 2,500 USDT USDT Every Week

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards